Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

The Star Tribune's Changing Headlines

Media_httpfarm4static_xgrdl
Ever wonder why the Star Tribune includes code that forces your browser to reload periodically? Ever wonder why they don't have full RSS feeds? I understand that stories evolve as more information becomes available, but watching the Star Tribune's headlines change online before (and sometimes after) they go to print has been an interesting experience for me the last week or so. My handy RSS reader, Vienna, treats each time a headline changes as a different link and stores it. Below are a few examples. In the final headline I link to the story: On July 22nd, the Star Tribune published a story titled "Senate votes to move ahead with plan to curb speculation in oil markets that some blame for high oil prices." A few hours later, the headline changed, pointing to the same story: "Oil speculation bill provides Senate forum for partisan energy blame game." This change took the focus off of "oil speculation" being to blame to it being a "partisan energy blame game." The next day, on July 23rd, "Help for homeowners, mortgage giant sails through House, on track to become law" was updated after the vote to "House approves bill that aims to help strapped homeowners facing foreclosure, mortgage giants" but ultimately the final headline read "Help for strapped homeowners, mortgage giants sails through House after Bush drops opposition," where it now sounds like Bush gets a lot more credit. On July 25th, a story that head a headline that sounded like good news for Obama turned into a pro-McCain headline: "In shadow of Obama trip, McCain works battleground states and raises campaign funds" went to "McCain claims Obama's policies for Iraq could have led to war across Middle East" in the afternoon. Before it went to press it became "McCain mocks Obama policy for Iraq as 'audacity of hopelessness' that could have lost the war." Ouch. On July 26th, I saw a headline go through eight different versions. "Obama defends decision to travel to Europe, Middle East, says it'll help Americans in long run" changed slightly to "Barack Obama defends trip to Europe and Middle East, saying it'll help Americans in long run" to "Obama defends decision to travel to Europe, says US must work with allies" to "Barack Obama defends trip through Mideast, Europe, says US must cooperate with allies" to "Barack Obama defends decision to travel to Europe and Mideast, says US must work with allies" to "Obama defends decision to travel to Europe and Mideast, says US must work with its allies" to "Barack Obama rejects criticism of trip, says John McCain moving his way on Iraq, Afghanistan" to finally "Obama rejects criticism of trip, says McCain moving his way on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan." The key words here are "Obama defends decision" changing to "Obama rejects criticism." Also on the same day, a story titled "Bush signing legislation next week to triple funds for AIDS around the world" changed to "Bush says he's eager to sign legislation to triple funds for fighting AIDS around world." It changes from the fact it will be signed to talking about how Bush is eager to do so. On July 29th, bad news for McCain: "John McCain steps back from 'no new tax' pledge, gets rebuked by conservative anti-tax group" turns to "John McCain returns to 'no new tax' pledge after criticism from anti-tax group." Funny though, how bad news for McCain can turn into positive news: after another headline change he sounds proactive: "Analysis: McCain eager to reassure anxious conservatives he won't raise taxes." On July 31st, "Bush poised to report Thursday on progress in Iraq war." After the report, the headline and story was updated: "Bush declares significant progress in the Iraq war, saying terrorists 'are on the run.'" Sounds like the same old news right? Well, the headline changes again to "Bush cites progress in Iraq, suggests further US troop withdrawals possible." The final version, headline changed later in the day reads: "Citing gains in Iraq, Bush hints at possibility of further US troop withdrawals this year." Sounds like great news now. While not presidential in nature, it was too interesting not to include: Also on July 31st, "Alaska Sen. Stevens, in arraignment, expected to plead not guilty to hiding $250,000 in gifts" turned to "Alaska Sen. Stevens, in arraignment, pleads not guilty to hiding $250,000 in gifts" which later read as "Alaska Sen. Stevens pleads not guilty to corruption, gets chance to clear name before election." Overnight it got its final title, "Sen. Stevens takes 'gutsy' tactic, asks for speedy corruption trial in time for elections" which doesn't include the words "guilty" "hiding" and "$250,000 in gifts."
Media_httpfarm4static_cjwge
On August 1st, "Obama calls for $1,000 energy rebates to be paid with windfall profits tax on the oil industry," which was mildly edited to say "Obama proposes $1,000 rebate checks from oil company profits as part of pitch to Fla. voters." Sounds like a great deal. The headline then gets changed to focus on a right-wing hot-button issue: "Obama shifts, now says he would be willing to back limited additional offshore oil drilling." The final story reads: "Obama endorses energy compromise that includes additional offshore drilling." On August 2nd, a headline about Obama and McCain agreeing on debates turned into different story: "Obama campaign agrees to 3 debates with McCain and 1 between their running mates" changed to "Obama steps back from McCain challenge for series of debates, agreeing only to standard 3." That's quite a different story. The final headline painted Obama even weaker: "Playing it safe, Obama steps back from McCain's challenge for a series of summer debates." I want to stress that in all of these cases, the changing headlines all link to the same story URL. I think there's a pattern here.

I-35W Bridge Redesign

Media_httpfarm3static_zhifo

Star Tribune Quote, originally uploaded by s4xton.

Jim Foti of the Star Tribune quoted me in a story today about the I-35W Bridge redesign, Debate begins: Elegant simplicity or uninspired slab?.

Aaron Landry of Minneapolis said his first reaction was that the state was replacing "a structurally deficient bridge with an aesthetically deficient one," but his views softened Tuesday after he visited the Minnesota Department of Transportation website and checked out the designs that didn't win. "Out of the choices, this is the best one," he said.

People who follow me on Twitter heard the same quote a couple days ago. While what I said might be harsh, it was honestly my first reaction when the design was released.

Since I've taken more time to look at it, my opinion has changed a bit. In my conversation with the Star Tribune I mentioned a few things that I almost wish would have gotten published instead. For example, one of the main feelings I get when looking at the bridge design now is that it's a simple, strong-looking bridge. Jim Foti joked with me that hey, if it looks strong, it must be strong! Honestly, I think that makes a big impact with people's impressions considering the circumstances. It's a strong-looking bridge!

I also spent a bunch of time talking about the lighting. If you look at the full proposal (88mb PDF) you can see a rendering of it at dusk with a nice blue glow to it. I suggested that under the bridge the lighting could be changing or moving, joking that if it took example of from the lighting atop of the Target Headquarters building, perhaps it and the bridge could talk to one another through the night. I thought about it a bit more and realized it may not be a bad idea. Perhaps it could be pulled off in an decent and artful manner without it being obnoxious. It's one of the few bridge locations where a creative lighting solution like that would be appropriate. Of course, this would only be on the underside of the bridge as to not distract motorists.

I think it could be a relatively inexpensive, appropriate and unique way to make our new bridge augment our cityscape at night. What do you think?

Par Barred from the Strib, Offered Internship by The Daily Mole

As published by Minnesota Monitor, after Par Ridder was ordered out as the Star Tribune publisher, he was quickly offered an internship by former City Pages editor Steve Perry to work on his new local media startup, The Daily Mole:
Dear Par, We at the Daily Mole were saddened to hear of your abrupt exit from the Newspaper of the Twin Cities this morning. We can only hope it spells an end to the scorn and mockery you have endured in your time of trial. People can be so judgmental. Especially judges. As your friends have no doubt pointed out, sometimes the best thing one can do with such adversity is to turn the page. In that spirit, we want to be the first to offer you a chance at clearing the slate and earning back your good name. (And make no mistake: Ridder, under normal circumstances, is a very good name.) We're talking work. A job. And by "job," I mean unpaid internship. If you will agree to sell advertising for the Daily Mole for a period of six months, gratis, we will pledge to consider hiring you full-time. As a Daily Mole intern, your perks would include a desk (with chair), access to a telephone, and a whole box of business cards. You would need a laptop computer of your own, but we assume that's not an issue. Courage! Best wishes, The Mole People
Considering he's on a year long vacation from the Star Tribune publisher position I think he should take it.

Minneapolis Critical Mass

Photo removed.

City Pages: MPLS police administer tear gas, beat down cyclists in Loring Park

WCCO: 19 Arrested In Minneapolis Bicycle Protest

Flickr: Minneapolis Critical Mass Photoset

capthek: View from above

Star Tribune: 19 bicyclists arrested after rally turns into melee

YouTube: Adepter's Videos [via]

UPDATE Sept 1: Steve Marsh was there and sums it up.

The one big thing I think people are really missing about this story is that this might be more about this than it is about Critical Mass. They, the bloggers and media are all giving CM a bad rap. I think this whole story might be more about the pReNC who decided to join up with CM this time around.

Check out Michelle Gross' email after visiting those who were arrested.

UPDATE Sept 3: Well, maybe I was on the right track. Jason DeRusha writes:

Heather Brown is working on a story for our news at six, looking at the Republican Welcoming Committee group of anti-RNC protestors. Of all the 19 arrested, about half are connected to that protest group, not Critical Mass. Too bad for CM. It seems that some outsiders are tarnishing a group of people who love riding, and are out for a monthly good time.

MinnPost Announced

MinnPost.com will offer exclusive front-page news stories as well as “posts," a new format in which professional journalists engage in an informal conversation with readers about what they're learning and what to make of it. Posts will be a bit like blogs, but unlike many blogs, they will be built around original reporting – not just opinions or links to other people’s work. MinnPost.com, which will publish Monday through Friday, also will offer daily roundups providing perspective on metro, state, national and international news, stories from selected content partners (currently under discussion), commentary from community leaders and experts, and comment from and involvement of readers.
--Joel Kramer's Announcement this morning as relayed by Brian Lambert. (Now on minnpost.com/news) I'm not excited. I don't see yet how this is going to be all that different than startribune.com or twincities.com. It quacks like a newspaper "gone online but a little different." What would separate this from MPR ramping up their local news site, hiring a few of these journalists and throwing in a little of their "new media initiative" magic fairy dust for a little citizen-involvement twist?