I put your site in my RSS reader too.
Matt over at MNspeak… well… I think part of it is that he’s been really busy with other things too. It was fun being “editor” for a couple days over there though.
]]>http://flickr.com/groups/tc/discuss/72157600044394239/
For the record I don’t think Matt is doing a bad job over at mnspeak. Its just nice to see local photos or photoblogs on there every once in a while.
]]>Do look into the rebel, that’s what I ended up going with and I’m very happy with it. Whatever camera you get, make sure you pick it up and hold it first. Sounds like you’ve already held the D40 and thats important. Don’t buy a nice camera without holding it first. The grip is small on the rebel and that can be an issue if you have large hands. Slapping on a battery pack grip solves this problem for most people as the overall grip becomes larger. It’s an add on and doesn’t come with the camera.
My rebel XTi came with really nice software, Digital Photo Professional. I’m not sure if the D40 does. Just another thing to consider.
Thanks for the link to my photo from MNspeak. I used to appear in the daily links a lot more when rex was running things but that was then, this is now. Anyways good luck with your decision.
]]>Why can’t they go back to that?
]]>I bought a Canon Rebel two years ago and I couldn’t be happier with it.
]]>Jeremy- Right now I’m using a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P100. It’s taken many hardwood floor beatings but now a couple times the lens won’t come out. A battery reset does the trick. As for nice cameras on mobile devices, Ben at Technology Evangelist recommended I check out the Nokia N93. He was really impressed with it. And yeah… no man purse for me either.
Mike- As you probably guessed, I’m not looking at the D40x. The extra few megapixels and 3 fps compared to 2.5 fps doesn’t make much difference for me. I do have to look at Canon again. I spent some time comparing to the Pentax K100D (Ed just got one) but not much with the Canon EOS cameras. I’ll look into them later this weekend.
And thank you for reminding me as you’re absolutely correct: this very likely will be an expensive gateway to more lenses and accessories.
]]>I think you’ve hit on a lot of good issues around the D40 vs. D80 in your post. You are going for the D40 and not the pricier D40x right? And have you rejected Canon for any reason? I’d say Canon and Nikon are the two best options for pro systems. Both have a bazillion accessories. But Canon is acknowledged by many to have somewhat better sensors. I personally can’t tell the difference. I’ve stuck with Nikon because that’s what I started with way back in high school so I’m used to the industrial design.
It’s good that you’re putting some weight into your unique user scenario; that you need entry-level features realizing you won’t use the advanced stuff for a long time if ever. All too many people just assume an expensive, feature-laden (and manly looking) camera will make better photos.
Leaping to the D40 from whatever you’re using right now will not only bring you into the world of high resolution and significantly better image quality, but you’ll be able to shoot with effects like very shallow depth of field as well as easily add screw-on glass filters for an enormous variety of effects and controls. DSLRs also do much better at high ISOs than most point ‘n shoots, so you’ll have huge freedom to shoot in dim available light.
Realize that you’re committing to system camera, so that will open the temptation to add accessories. This will make you and Nikon happy, but your wallet will take a beating. I guarantee you’ll outgrow the kit lens to add the 50mm f1.8, which is a great value. Then you might want a good matching flash. Then you’ll need another lens for macro or long telephoto. But if you are going to shoot more, it’s all good.
I hope this helps…
]]>